AKLEG Day 63: 39-20
While Republicans claimed there's still time to fund schools, the future is far from certain.
Good afternoon, Alaska.
In this edition: By a single vote, the Alaska Legislature has failed to override Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of a landmark education bill, dashing hopes of increasing the baseline school funding formula. During nearly two hours of debate, Republicans who had supported the original bill offered various explanations ranging from the need to take a second shoot at the legislation while others said they only voted for it because they were anticipating precisely this veto. In a bleak set of speeches, others questioned if investing in schools is worthwhile, leaving education’s future in limbo.
Current mood: 🤬
39-20
Senate Bill 140 was a good start but could have been better. The governor has the constitutional right to get his way on legislation. Senate Bill 140 is just a priority bill, and the only thing that was ever going to matter anyway was the budget. I never really supported Senate Bill 140; I just supported it to get to the veto faster. Schools should be treated like the failing businesses they are, and we should stop spending so much money on them.
That’s just a sampling of the arguments put forward by the 20 Republicans whose votes ensured Alaska Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of what would have been the largest single increase to the state’s school funding formula in state history stood during today’s joint session.
In all, 17 Republicans who had supported SB140 ultimately sided with the governor.
The arguments read as needlessly obsequious toward the governor, dishonest, and, frankly, desperately grim about Alaska’s future. While several Republicans insisted that despite their vote, they care about education—perhaps more than everyone else—some couldn’t help but give away the simmering animosity against schools that have defined many corners of the Republican party.
“How long? How long are we going to continue to throw money at a business — and school districts are a business. How long are we going to throw money at a business and not get a return on investment?” said Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, who took aim at districts that had been banking on the increase to cover multi-million-dollar shortfalls. “How can you use hope as a business strategy?”
The legislation would also have helped rural schools upgrade internet speeds, provided additional help for students struggling with reading, and increased funding for homeschooling. In total, the package would have outlined nearly a quarter of a billion dollars in new education spending in Alaska. That spending would still need to be approved through the budget later this year, which was a reason cited by several Republicans who turned on the legislation.
However, not everything can or will be made whole through the budget.
Bethel Democratic Sen. Lyman Hoffman, who sponsored the original version of Senate Bill 140, pleaded with fellow legislators during the hearing to override the veto so the time-critical provisions dealing with internet upgrades could pass. He said he was appalled that the legislation had been hijacked at the expense of rural kids, warning that failing to override the vote would mean those students go another year with substandard internet speeds.
Republicans like McCabe suggested the internet upgrades, which call for new infrastructure, are a waste of money when satellite internet is on the market.
The path ahead is not clear.
While some Republicans called for a second education bill encompassing much of what was in Senate Bill 140 with enough measures to appease the governor, Dunleavy made it abundantly clear during last week’s news conference that he’s not interested. He said that if legislators wanted to pursue a new education bill, that was “fine,” but his administration was moving on to issues like energy.
It’s also important to note that there’s a reason the governor’s priorities—an $180 million study on the value of paying teachers more and a charter school power grab—weren’t in the budget. They couldn’t even garner majority support in the Republican-controlled House. It’s unlikely that a second shot will change that dynamic.
What’s more likely is that any education funding will be left entirely to the budget. The governor and his allies have made clear that even the funding level dictated by the base student allocation is merely a suggestion, so nothing is guaranteed, not even the status quo funding levels.
For schools, this means that uncertainty will continue to loom over their budgets for much of the remaining session. Many had been banking on a $680 increase to the base student allocation to take the edge off of multimillion-dollar budget shortfalls. Now, districts will have to budget without any certainty over what—if any—funding eventually makes it past Governor Dunleavy and his sycophants.
Stay tuned.
Follow the thread: The legislative joint session on the SB140 override
The no votes
There were 20 Republicans who voted against the override, ensuring the governor’s veto stood. Just three—Reps. Eastman, Prax, and Sen. Shower—originally voted against the measure. The remaining 17 members abandoned the education bill and are marked in bold (with particularly narrow elections noted in parenthesis).
Rep. Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River
Rep. Thomas Baker, R-Kotzebue
Rep. Ben Carpenter, R-Nikiski
Rep. Julie Coulombe, R-Anchorage (who won by 112 votes)
Rep. Mike Cronk, R-Tok
Rep. David Eastman, R-Wasilla
Rep. Craig Johnson, R-Anchorage
Rep. DeLena Johnson, R-Palmer
Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake
Rep. Tom McKay, R-Anchorage (who won by just nine votes)
Rep. Mike Prax, R-North Pole
Rep. Dan Saddler, R-Eagle River
Rep. Laddie Shaw, R-Anchorage
Rep. Cathy Tilton, R-Wasilla
Rep. Frank Tomaszewski, R-Fairbanks
Rep. Sarah Vance, R-Homer
Sen. Shelley Hughes, R-Palmer
Sen. Robb Myers, R-North Pole
Sen. Mike Shower, R-Wasilla
Sen. David Wilson, R-Wasilla
The yes votes
Thirty-nine legislators, including all Democrats and independents, voted in favor of the override. House Majority Republican Reps. Will Stapp, Jesse Sumner, Justin Ruffridge, and Stanley Wright broke from their fellow Majority Republicans to support the override.
Rep. Jennie Armstrong, D-Anchorage
Rep. Ashley Carrick, D-Anchorage
Rep. Maxine Dibert, D-Fairbanks
Rep. Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham
Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage
Rep. Neal Foster, D-Nome
Rep. Alyse Galvin, I-Anchorage
Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage
Rep. Cliff Groh, D-Anchorage
Rep. Sara Hannan, D-Juneau
Rep. Rebecca Himschoot, I-Sitka
Rep. Andy Josephson, D-Anchorage
Rep. CJ McCormick, D-Bethel
Rep. Donna Mears, D-Anchorage
Rep. Genevieve Mina, D-Anchorage
Rep. Dan Ortiz, I-Ketchikan
Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna
Rep. Calvin Schrage, I-Anchorage
Rep. Will Stapp, R-Fairbanks
Rep. Andi Story, D-Juneau
Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak
Rep. Jesse Sumner, R-Wasilla
Rep. Stanley Wright, R-Anchorage
Sen. Click Bishop, R-Fairbanks
Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski
Sen. Matt Claman, D-Anchorage
Sen. Forrest Dunbar, D-Anchorage
Sen. Cathy Giessel, R-Anchorage
Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson, D-Anchorage
Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel
Sen. James Kaufman, R-Anchorage
Sen. Scott Kawasaki, D-Fairbanks
Sen. Jesse Kiehl, D-Juneau
Sen. Kelly Merrick, R-Eagle River
Sen. Donny Olson, D-Golovin
Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka
Sen. Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak
Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage
Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage
It's discouraging and, if your particular legislator voted No, tell them it was not ok and why. Keep on them. Thanks for your reporting Matt.
My representative (Cronk) voted no. Western Goldstream got redistricted into his Cronkymander via the shady redistricting process. He doesn’t answer emails and has not shown up in Fairbanks to talk with his new constituents. The other path forward is to reach out to his rural constituents and determine what issues we all have in common.
On the positive side Sen Lyman Hoffman’s comments showed real leadership. Worth looking up and giving a listen.